Unmet needs in end-of-life care for heart failure patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate end-of-life (EoL) care for heart failure (HF) in Tuscany (Italy) from healthcare professionals' perspective and identify areas for intervention. METHODS: All the directors of Cardiology units (n = 29) and palliative care (PC) units (n = 14) in Tuscany were surveyed on the practices of EoL care. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of cardiologists reported that their hospital had some EoL care services for HF patients. However, 75% did not have a multidisciplinary team providing EoL care for HF patients. Sixty-four percent stated that <25% of patients who might benefit from PC did receive it, and 18% stated that no patient received PC. For most of PC specialists, HF patients accounted for <25% of their patients. PC specialists believed that patients with cancer diseases were much more likely to receive PC than HF patients at EoL, and 36% judged that almost no HF patients were timely referred to hospice care. The majority of PC specialists reported that almost no HF patient prepared advance healthcare directives, as opposite to 57% for cancer patients, suggesting poor understanding or acceptance of their terminal condition. CONCLUSIONS: The management of HF patients in the EoL stage in Tuscany is often suboptimal. EoL care should be implemented to ensure an adequate quality of life to these patients.

Exploring Cost-Effectiveness of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Geriatric Oncology: A Narrative Review.

The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and the corresponding geriatric interventions are beneficial for community-dwelling older persons in terms of reduced mortality, disability, institutionalisation and healthcare utilisation. However, the value of CGA in the management of older cancer patients both in terms of clinical outcomes and in cost-effectiveness remains to be fully established, and CGA is still far from being routinely implemented in geriatric oncology. This narrative review aims to analyse the available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of CGA adopted in geriatric oncology, identify the relevant parameters used in the literature and provide recommendations for future research. The review was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane databases, covering published studies without selection by the publication year. The extracted data were categorised according to the study design, participants and measures of cost-effectiveness, and the results are summarised to state the levels of evidence. The review conforms to the SANRA guidelines for quality assessment. Twenty-nine studies out of the thirty-seven assessed for eligibility met the inclusion criteria. Although there is a large heterogeneity, the overall evidence is consistent with the measurable benefits of CGA in terms of reducing the in-hospital length of stay and treatment toxicity, leaning toward a positive cost-effectiveness of the interventions and supporting CGA implementation in geriatric oncology clinical practice. More research employing full economic evaluations is needed to confirm this evidence and should focus on CGA implications both from patient-centred and healthcare system perspectives.

Research protocol for the validation of a new portable technology for real-time continuous monitoring of Early Warning Score (EWS) in hospital practice and for an early-stage multistakeholder assessment.

INTRODUCTION: The real-time continuous monitoring of vital parameters in patients affected by multiple chronic conditions and/or COVID-19 can lead to several benefits to the Italian National Healthcare System (IT-NHS). The UBiquitous Integrated CARE (UBICARE) technology is a novel health digital platform at the validation stage in hospital setting. UBICARE might support the urgent need for digitalisation and early intervention, as well as minimise the face-to-face delivery of care in both hospital and community-based care settings. This research protocol aims to design an early-stage assessment of the multidimensional impact induced by UBICARE within the IT-NHS alongside technology validation in a hospital ward. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The targeted patients will be medium/high-risk hypertensive individuals as an illustrative first example of how UBICARE might bring benefits to susceptible patients. A mixed-method study will be applied to incorporate to the validation study a multistakeholder perspective, including perceived patient experiences and preferences, and facilitate technology adoption. First, semistructured interviews will be undertaken with a variety of stakeholders including clinicians, health managers and policy-makers to capture views on the likely technology utility, economic sustainability, impact of adoption in hospital practice and alternative adoption scenarios. Second, a monocentric, non-randomised and non-comparative clinical study, supplemented by the administration of standardised usability questionnaires to patients and health professionals, will validate the use of UBICARE in hospital practice. Finally, the results of the previous stages will be discussed in a multidisciplinary-facilitated workshop with IT-NHS relevant stakeholders to reconcile stakeholders' perspectives. Limitations include a non-random recruitment strategy in the clinical study, small sample size of the key stakeholders and potential stakeholder recruitment bias introduced by the research technique. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ethics Committee for Clinical Experimentation of Tuscany Region approved the protocol. Participation in this study is voluntary. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences.

The Association between Education and Rehabilitation Outcomes: a Population Retrospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: Retrospective observational study aiming at testing whether different education levels in older adults are associated with the rehabilitation outcome. STUDY DESIGN: The study planned to cover all patients of over 65 rehabilitated from 2015 to 2017 at Golgi-Redaelli, a large government-funded rehabilitation Institute in Northern Italy comprising of three centers. Different administrative datasets were linked to investigate the factors associated with the functional outcome. The cohort resulted in 2,486 older adults for whom information on education and rehabilitation outcome was available. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rehabilitation outcome was measured with the Barthel Index testing the ability in basic activities of daily living and the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment measuring stability and walking. Multiple linear and logistic regression models were run controlling for rehabilitation setting and center of care, age, gender, cognitive functioning and comorbidity. RESULTS: Education resulted negatively associated with functional recovery. Patients with at least 8 years of education improved 2.24 point less in Barthel Index (out of100) and 0.70 points less in Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (out of 28) than the less educated patients. Results confirmed the importance of cognitive functioning in predicting rehabilitation outcome in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Different mechanisms can explain an unexpected negative association between education and rehabilitation outcome, when possible inequalities in access to care are controlled for by study design (the cohort was admitted to a NHS-funded institute). Additional studies are needed to confirm our results and to test more specific hypotheses about the degree of effectiveness of rehabilitation across socio-economic groups.

Waiting time information in the Italian NHS: A citizen perspective.

Public involvement in the management and communication of waiting times is known to support initiatives to reduce waiting times, as well as increase fairness and promote transparency and accountability. In order to improve transparency and communication to citizens, Italy recently updated the National Regulatory Plan for Waiting Lists (2019-2021), which calls for the disclosure of waiting time information on healthcare provider webpages. This study analyses waiting time information for outpatient visits and digital services available on the institutional website pages of 144 public healthcare organisations in nine regions and two autonomous provinces of Italy. Web pages were analysed both in terms of the available information/services, using a grid, and in terms of the quality of the text using an advanced readability assessment tool (READ-IT). This information was complemented and validated by regional healthcare key informants during research-specific workshops. Waiting time information disclosure, digital services and text readability varied both within and between the regional healthcare systems and organisations. The types and characteristics of waiting time information and statistics vary considerably with a negative impact on their use for benchmarking and their readability and usability for booking purposes. Overall, communication weaknesses due to low harmonization and clarity of information can undermine efforts in effectively informing and involving the public through online waiting time data disclosure.